 |
Rolling Along
Given the roll-call of people associated with bringing
a Broadway show to life, it is sometimes difficult to determine
who is the most influential. In truth, they act as a team and one
could argue none is dispensable. But, in the case of Merrily We
Roll Along there is one person (ironically not in the "team"
in the strictest sense) without whom the show would have died long
ago on the Broadway stage and we would not have had the option of
bringing it to you today.
Thomas J Shepard was vice-president of RCA records at the time
of Merrily's disastrous Broadway premier in 1981. He was a long-time
fan of Sondheim's work and had personally overseen the Broadway
Cast recordings of most of his shows. Thus, following one of the
most hostile receptions given to any Broadway show on record, he
pleaded with his bosses at RCA still to keep the faith and preserve
Merrily for posterity. We will never know for certain, but it is
probably due to this one act of loyalty that the show's long-term
future has been assured.
Sondheim's long-term collaborator and producer, Harold (Hal) Prince
suggested the project and quickly enlisted the support of Sondheim
and librettist George Furth. This trio had previously worked very
successfully on Company in 1970. The new show was intended to be
pure musical comedy, a big dance show, immediately accessible and
a far cry from the darker, esoteric shows that had consumed Sondheim
for so many years. Thus, the choreographer Ron Field was added to
the team.
The base material was a play by Moss Hart and George S Kaufman
from 1934 that Hal Prince had remembered from his youth despite
the fact that at 155 performances, it was hardly considered a success.
The main elements of the story are all there. In the original, the
action covered the years 1934-1916. The new show was to cover the
period 1980-1955 and an early decision was to use a raw, teenaged
cast. Sondheim didn't try to imitate the music of the period reasoning
that, although it might be possible to differentiate musically between
decades, it was not possible to differentiate between, say, 1969
and 1966.
And so it was that a group of unknowns (some of them appearing
on stage for virtually the first time) were signed early in 1981
for the new Prince/Sondheim hit. As the score was still being written,
there was a significant delay – 9 months in fact – until
rehearsals began in September 1981…and it was at this point
that Ron Field claims first to have had misgivings about what was
to be one of the most troublesome shows that Broadway had ever known.
"…I couldn't understand the show. I was listening, with
question marks coming out of my ears, my eyes, my heart and my brain.
It didn’t; seem possible that this was going to work –
this thing that was backwards. I just couldn't understand it. The
lazy part of me kept saying, 'You'll get it…it'll come to
you.'. I was so perplexed. I would look at the set and it didn’t
seem attractive or make any sense to me. Then I would look at the
people who were cast who couldn't sing, certainly couldn't dance,
were clearly unattractive, and most had never been in a show before.
They were amateurs."
Field initially kept his fears to himself but, as rehearsals continued,
it became clear that relationships between him and the generally
up-beat Hal Prince were becoming more and more strained. The cast
became confused: Field would tell them to do one thing and then
Prince would change it. Still, rehearsals continued as the show
moved inexorably towards its previews.
The almost inviolate rule is that Broadway shows are previewed
"out of town", in smaller venues. The reasons are clear:
almost no show opens on Broadway unchanged from how the writers
first write it. Shows are changed for all sorts of reasons; length,
dialogue or songs that don't work, confusion in the plotting, staging…the
list is endless. The need to change things sometimes becomes obvious
in the comparative privacy of the rehearsal hall but some things
don't become obvious until you have to perform to an audience…and
the worst place to find this out is in the full glare of publicity…somewhere,
in fact, like Broadway. And so previews in other, less prestigious
venues are de rigueur.
For economic reasons it had been decided not to test Merrily out
of town. The team was encouraged in this decision as a previous
production (Sweeney Todd) had done very well without the benefit
of out-of-town previews. Unfortunately, lightening was not destined
to strike twice and Merrily's troubles-to-come were played out on
Broadway before an eager press.
At the dress rehearsal, Prince threw out all the costumes. Lonny
Price, who played Charley, remembered sitting in the theatre "…and
just looking at the set and thinking, 'Why is it so ugly?' It was
horrifying. And they had made these really original, very strange,
very witty costumes at great expense. And I had suits and wigs.
I had like twelve hairpieces. … So we were doing the dress
parade and there were these fifteen-year-old girls… we all
looked like we were in Bugsy Malone. And Hal stood up and said,
'Look, we've made a mistake here and want you to take everything
off and we're going to put you all in jeans and sweatshirts. I'm
sorry. The whole concept doesn't work. I'm sorry.'"
For his part, Prince had originally intended to produce the show
with no scenery and minimal costume and stage dressing. Only Sondheim
supported him. Prince remembers that everybody else cautioned "'You
can't do that and charge thirty dollars. You can't do that on Broadway.
If you want to do that, you've got to go off-Broadway, otherwise
forget it.' So I was persuaded. So we tried to find scenery that
didn't look like scenery and we got into terrible trouble on the
costumes. We tried to make the set look like it wasn't there: instead
it was there and it was awful."
Previews began at the Alvin on 8th October, 1981. The evening was
40 minutes too long; the audience didn't understand the "backward"
structure of the story; the dances didn't work and the leading man
was strong enough. (hardly surprising – and certainly not
his fault – considering that he had applied simply to be Prince's
assistant and was an inexperienced on-stage performer.) The gossip
had started. Ten days into the previews, the Daily News reported
"The walkouts from the new Hal Prince-Steve Sondheim musical
are almost epidemic. There were about 140 people who left after
the intermission at a recent performance."
Three days later, on 21st October, the New York Times announced:
"Merrily We Roll Along, a musical in preview at the Alvin Theatre
has changed its leading man and postponed its opening from November
1 to November 8. On Monday night on a trial basis, Jim Walton [who
was playing a smaller role in the show] replaced James Weissenbach
as the composer who becomes a movie producer. The change became
permanent yesterday. A spokesman for the production said that as
changes occurred during rehearsals and previews, Mr Walton seemed
to be better for the role."
The situation with Ron Field got worse and, as he was being put
under pressure, so his relationship with the young cast became more
brutal. Finally, on 24th October, the Times reported: "Ron
Field has been replaced by Larry Fuller as the choreographer of
the new musical currently in previews at the Alvin. Mr Field …
left the production because of artistic differences." And then
on 27th October: "Merrily Is Postponed Second Time to November
16 …to give Larry Fuller additional time to work on the dances."
Finally, 16th November arrived and Merrily opened. The reviews
were devastating. …a "dud"; "looks like it
cost all of $28"; "a severe letdown"; "a blunder";
"short on character, short on motivation, long only on bitchiness";
"Sondheim's thinnest score"; "the show … is
a shambles". Only one reviewer, Clive Barnes in the New York
Post wrote positively: "Whatever you may have heard about it
– go and see it for yourselves. It is far too good a musical
to be judged by those twin kangaroo courts of word of mouth and
critical consensus."
Prince tells of the amount of work that went on during the previews;
not only to improve the show but also to keep the spirits up of
those involved in it. "And by the time we were through, not
only were they not walking out in droves, but many were sitting
there and cheering. But it was too goddamned late. … It was
the gossip columns that told us we had committed a major crime against
society. And, of course, if you had tickets for a show and you walked
in having read that, the show didn't get much of a chance."
And he also ruefully admitted, "The time out on the road, away
from New York, is crucial."
16 performances later, the show closed. The following day the cast
went into the studio to sing the score for the last time and to
lay down the tracks that would ultimately ensure its longevity.
George Furth sent the script and recording to director-playwright
James Lapine hopeful that he might be able to initiate a new production
on the West Coast. Lapine had never seen the Broadway production
and was excited by the material. Sondheim however was so crushed
by the experience that he even considered taking up a new career
and leaving the theatre world that he felt "hated me and Hal".
Instead, Lapine and Sondheim worked together on the successful Sunday
in the Park with George and it was not until after this that the
opportunity came again to look at Merrily.
The 1985 California production had a greatly revised book and was
performed by a considerably older cast than the Broadway original.
Songs were added and deleted. The single biggest change came at
the beginning and end of the show. (In the original, Frank addresses
a graduation at his old university, the students turning into the
actors of the main story. The show ends where it begins, at the
graduation. These scenes were entirely deleted.) With encouraging
(but still variable) reviews, the show was obviously in much better
shape. Since then, the show has received two more major revivals
each of which has given its creators the chance to work on it further;
1990 in Washington and 1992 at our own Leicester Haymarket. It is
this Leicester version of 1992 that is now considered the definitive
one and is met with rave reviews whenever it is staged.
At that time, John Porter of the Sunday Times commented that the
show had never been seen in the West End saying "If London
producers have any sense of enterprise left, they ought to be queuing
up outside to lay their hands on Merrily We Roll Along." Sheridan
Morley wrote: "If the West End cannot get this one into town,
then it no longer deserves to be called the theatre capital of the
world." It was briefly staged at the Donmar Warehouse where
it won the 2001 Olivier Award for Best Musical.
Merrily We Roll Along, the show whose initial failure marked the
end of the Sondheim/Prince partnership, no longer needs apologetic
excuses. It stands shoulder to shoulder with the best of them. …and
the full-scale West End production? Despite Sheridan Morley's entreaty,
other than the stint at the Donmar Warehouse, London still waits.
Terry Foster
© ESOS 2005
Merrily We Roll Along – the story
The major musical and dramatic themes of the show (the nature of
hopes and dreams and how these can so often be lost or compromised)
are emphasized in the Prologue which features the entire Company.
Merrily proceeds in reverse chronological order. Short interludes
("Transitions") act as bridges between the scenes to move
the action backwards in time. Each scene presents the audience with
a situation, the critical elements of which are developed in later
scenes (but, of course, earlier in time)…so we know what has
happened before we find out why it has happened.
ACT I
1979
We are in the middle of a party at the Hollywood home of Franklin
Shepherd. The party is to celebrate the success of Frank's latest
film. Frank's old friend, Mary Flynn, is alone and slowly drinking
herself to oblivion. She presents not-so-quiet cynical observations
on the shallow "Hollywood set" that now seem to surround
Frank.
Frank's wife, Gussie Carnegie (a Broadway musical star…but,
we learn, too old to star in the movie) is also at the party as
is the movie's star, (and Frank's mistress), Meg.
Proceedings are brought to a standstill when someone unwisely mentions
the new Pulitzer prize-winning play by Charles Kringas. Mary, in
alcohol-induced abandon, explains that Charlie's name is never mentioned
in Frank's house since he (Charley) publicly embarrassed Frank on
national TV. Completely unaware, she now makes the same mistake
with a tirade that signals the end of their friendship.
As if things couldn't get worse, Gussie chooses this moment to
confront Frank and Meg about their affair. In a fit of rage, she
throws a bottle of iodine in Meg's face. As Meg is rushed to hospital,
Frank is left alone, his life in tatters.
1973
We are in a TV studio and Charley is getting prepared to go on a
live chat show to discuss his and Frank's Broadway and movie collaboration,
Musical Husbands. It is evident that the relationship between the
two old friends is rather strained. Frank has yet to arrive and
Charley complains to Mary that he is always off signing some deal
or other rather than working on the show Take a Left that they have
been putting off for so long. He is quite obviously nearing the
end of his tether with Frank. Mary tries to persuade him to give
Frank one more chance. Finally, Frank arrives – with his new
wife, Gussie.
Seconds before they go on air, Charley finds out by accident that
Frank has signed another big deal. He is enraged and lays into Frank
on-air. Realising, too late, that he has gone too far, Charley tries
to apologise but this is met by Frank's hitting him, sending him
sprawling to the floor.
1968
Frank is in his new, luxury Bel Air home unpacking upon his return
from a cruise. Mary and Charley arrive to welcome him bringing his
young son, Frank Jnr. We learn that Frank Jnr. now lives with his
mother, Beth.
Frank announces that he has secured a valuable option to do the
movie version of his and Charley's Broadway hit, Musical Husbands.
A row ensues, partly because Frank has gone behind Charley's back
but also because Charley's ideals are for "higher art".
Frank counters that, since his divorce, he needs the money. Mary,
as usual, tries to act as peacemaker.
The star and producer of their show arrive; Gussie Carnegie and
her husband, Joe Josephson. It becomes clear that Gussie's feelings
for Frank go much further than that of a professional relationship.
She plans to leave her husband for Frank and forces him to choose
between her and meeting his friends, Charley and Mary later that
evening.
1966
We are presented with the media circus on the steps of the Manhattan
Court House inside which Beth is filing for divorce. Frank is anxious
that he will lose his son, Frank Jnr.
Charley and Mary and other friends and associates come to offer
support. Mary tells him that he has just learnt a tough lesson and
together they all persuade him to take a long cruise to give himself
some time to get over things.
ACT II
1964
Gussie is performing her big number on the Broadway stage. This
is the first night of Frank and Charley's show Musical Husbands
and, through the stage door, they and their family and friends (except
Charley's wife, Evelyn, who went into labour in the middle of the
performance) hear first-hand that they have a sure fire hit. Life
is going to change for them all.
The group splinters as they have to deal variously with the show's
backers, Evelyn's labour and the after-show party. Mary senses that
Gussie's attentions towards Frank go much deeper and, as it appears
that they will be left alone together, she warns Beth of the danger
but Beth dismisses it.
1962
Gussie and Joe are throwing a party where the "in" crowd
are boasting everything they've done and gossiping…mostly
about each other. Frank, Beth, Mary and Charley turn up quite unprepared
to see all these celebrities in one place together. We learn that
Joe has optioned a play for Gussie to star and they want Frank and
Charley to write the score. Initially they are disappointed as they
thought that Joe wanted to produce the show they've been working
on for three years – but they finally agree. Gussie outrageously
and pointedly flirts with Frank and we discover that she will stop
at nothing to get what she wants.
1960
Before a sparse audience, Frank, Charley and Beth are performing
at a cabaret-bar quite obviously off, off-Broadway. Frank and Beth
are about to get married much to the disappointment of Mary (who
is very much in love with Frank herself), the bemusement of Joe
(who, with his fiancée, Gussie is also in the audience) and
the fury of Beth's parents.
1959-57
In one scene, an extended song, we are taken through the years 1957-1959
when Frank, Charley and Mary are all struggling to become established
in their chosen fields; Charley and Frank collaborating on writing
shows whilst supporting themselves with other, paid work and Mary,
at home by herself, taking many short-lived writing assignments
whilst avoiding writing her novel.
Frank arranges an audition with producer Joe Josephson who offers
encouraging (if boringly conservative) advice. As a result, Frank
decides that he and Charley should stage a revue of their own. Realizing
they don't have a singing "girl", they hold auditions
and Beth Spencer gets the part.
1957
In the early morning Frank and Charley are on the rooftop of their
apartment block awaiting the arrival of Sputnik overhead. Frank
is evidently recently demobbed from the forces and has been reading
Charley's plays. He is full of praise for his friend's work…as
is Charley for Frank's music. Frank suggests that they work together
on musical shows. At this moment they are surprised by a young woman,
also in nightclothes, also wanting to see Sputnik. They introduce
themselves and Mary exclaims how much she has enjoyed overhearing
Frank play piano in the apartment.
All three share binoculars to see the satellite go overhead. It
is a defining moment in their lives. "What a time to be alive!"
Frank exclaims and they link fingers in a triumphant bond of friendship.
© East Surrey Operatic Society, 2005
Bobby and Jackie and Jack
 |
The Kennedys
during JP's time as ambassador to the UK Eunice, JFK, Rosemary,
Jean, JP, Edward, Rose, Joseph Jr., Patricia, Robert F, Kathleen.
|
| A seemingly innocent satirical
cabaret song in Act II, "Bobby and Jackie and
Jack" presents us with real evidence of the
genius of Stephen Sondheim. He has fashioned a song,
supposedly created by the show's characters, that
could have been written in 1960…but, of course,
wasn't. The emotional
impact of Merrily We Roll Along is that the audience
becomes more "knowing" of the characters
whilst they themselves become less knowing. We
know the final outcome whilst we see the characters
step into situations, oblivious to the eventual
consequences of them.
And so it is with Bobby and Jackie and Jack. The
song works because we know the final outcome.
It works even better because it was "written"
from the perspective of 1960; three years before
the dream of Camelot was destroyed for ever with
the assassination of John Fitzgerald Kennedy.
In one fateful moment, or so it seemed, the hopes
and aspirations of the American people had vanished.
As so often in Merrily We Roll Along we observe
and contemplate "if only they knew what was
going to happen."
The USA emerged from WWII
as the pre-eminent power in the World. True, it
had suffered terrible losses, but none so devastating,
nor as financially far-reaching as those on the
European continent.
|
|
The years following the War saw the USA
reeling through a series of events and ever-increasing
social change whilst it also came to grips with its
position as leader of the free world. National paranoia
didn’t begin with the events of 9/11: trawl through
the years 1945-1960 and you'll see a nation struggling
to let go of values previously dictated by Victorian-born
leaders; increasing awareness of (and covert involvement
in) the unfriendly politics of neighbouring Southern
American countries; the race to produce the H-bomb;
aspirations of a middle-class (and ultimately false)
lifestyle portrayed in the media; a realization that
this same media was corrupt and peddled falsehoods as
truth; race riots; increasing involvement in un-winnable,
ideological wars and so on.
|
 |
| Sputnik
1957 |
|
But greatest of all was the fear of world domination
by communism and the threat that this posed to
the fabric of American life. The launch of the
Sputnik in 1957 was a tangible reminder of how
real that threat was and was greeted by many Americans
as a portent of dreadful things ahead. Indeed,
the threat of nuclear annihilation was only narrowly
averted some three years later when the USSR came
to the aid of Cuba in the face of American aggression.
The world held its breath.
The new pretender, JFK, who stood for liberal
values; who was going to stand against the legal
tyranny of the security services and who would
champion the American underclass – so often
the blacks – promised a new dawn. …and,
as was predicted, the start of a new political
dynasty in American leadership. In fact this family,
one of the most powerful in American politics
was also one of the most tragic.
Bobby and Jackie and Jack is of a time when the
Kennedy family had only suffered comparatively
private family tragedies. The very public tragedies
that would compound these were yet to happen and
as the Kennedy family grieved, so would America
with them.
Joseph Patrick Kennedy and Rose E Fitzgerald
married in 1914. He was a wealthy businessman
(and American Ambassador to the UK: 1938-40):
she, the eldest daughter of a Boston politician.
They had nine children four of whom died before
their time.
The eldest, Joseph Jnr. was groomed for a political
career but died in 1944 aged 29 when his bomber
blew up over the English Channel. Their second
child John Fitzgerald achieved the political dream
only to be assassinated in November 1963 not quite
three years after his inauguration, aged 46. Kathleen
(b. 1920) married the "unsuitable" (i.e.
Protestant) William Cavendish. He was killed in
battle in 1944 just four months after the wedding:
Kathleen died in a plane crash over France in
1948. Robert (b. 1925) served in the Navy during
WWII and then as his older brother's campaign
manager…and, as the song says, became Attorney
General during JFK's presidency. He was assassinated
in 1968 having won the California primary.
Four of the Kennedy children survive: Rosemary
Kennedy (b. 1918) suffered from mental retardation.
She still lives in a nursing convent following
a failed lobotomy in 1941. Eunice (b. 1921) has
devoted her life to helping the disabled –
especially those with mental disability. Patricia
(b. 1924) was married to – and later divorced
– the actor Peter Lawford. Jean (b. 1928)
also works with people with disabilities. Edward
(b. 1932) was denied nomination for the Democrat
Presidency due to embarrassing questions concerning
an incident at Chappaquiddick, Massachusetts when
the car he was driving went off a bridge. Although
he survived, his passenger didn’t and he
left the scene of the accident.
The tragedy that has dogged the Kennedy clan
also extends to the grandchildren; most notably
the children of the assassinated brothers John
and Robert. John and Jackie's eldest son John
(whom most people remember as a young boy standing
tearfully by his mother saluting at the time of
his father's murder) died with his wife in 1999
as the plane he was piloting to a family wedding
crashed. Their youngest child, Patrick survived
only two days in 1963. Robert and Ethel Kennedy
gave birth to 11 children, the last being born
after Bobby's assassination in 1968. Of these,
David (b. 1955) died of a cocaine overdose in
1984. Michael (b. 1958) died in a skiing accident
in 1997 following very public allegations of an
affair with the family's babysitter.
Commentators have spoken of the "curse of
the Kennedy's" and questioned just how much
tragedy one family can stand. Others have commented
on the stoicism that the family has shown in the
face of tragedy after tragedy. A week after losing
her son Robert to an assassin's bullet, Rose appeared
on television with her surviving son, Ted. She
drew on her faith in God to describe her reaction
to the tragedy. "We cannot always understand
the ways of Almighty God, the crosses which He
sends us, the sacrifices which He demands of us,"
Rose said. "But we know His great goodness
and His love and we go on our way with no regrets
from the past, not looking backwards to the past,
but we shall carry on with courage."
© East Surrey Operatic Society, 2005
|
|
|
|